COLLINS: Do only the people who suck up to council get help?
AND THE PHILOSOPHICAL DEBATES CONTINUE as Kamloops council’s Living and Sustainability Committee discussed the question of giving money to groups who are critical of city decisions. According to the story on InfoTel, Councillor Bill Sarai said he was uncomfortable giving out money to groups who don’t like council’s policies.
The city was discussing the splitting up of some $20,000 in climate funding between 16 applicants. One of those groups is Transition Kamloops, who has criticized council for not opposing a plan by Fortis B.C. to extend the use of natural gas in the province. Climate change activists want more time and money spent on better alternatives to gas and have publicly said so. Other groups have suggested a slower and more cautious approach.
I get where Councillor Sarai is coming from. It hurts when you’ve made what you believe is the right decision, and someone dumps on you. It’s tough, but you have to take the higher road. Unless the criticism is so blatantly incorrect or contains libelous or slanderous remarks, let them go. Criticism is not a bad thing. It can prompt groups like council to rethink their positions and maybe even change them.
My criteria is such — is the group legitimate? Are they following the rules pertaining to non-profits? Do their sources have some sort of credibility? Does their criticism seem well thought out? If they tick off the boxes, give them the funds.