GINTA: We need driving laws that protect pedestrians first
A WHILE BACK I read a book that was as poignant as it was scary. It is called A Deadly Wandering: A Tale of Tragedy and Redemption in the Age of Attention, by Matt Richtel. I mentioned it at the time because of the high volume of drivers busted driving and texting at the time. I am picking up the topic again because somehow the issue of distracted driving does not seem to go away. How could it? The people at the other end are doing their best to keep our attention hooked to the devices through whatever pings and screen traps necessary.
And yet, as easy as it is to put the blame on that, we ought to remind ourselves that we are responsible to put the phone out of sight — and mind — while driving. Many don’t. A driver on Vancouver Island was spotted by police with her phone on her lap. The driver argued that the phone was just charging and she was not using it, but she got a ticket anyway, which she contested. Eventually a provincial court decided that the driver did not violate the law. Plugging a phone in does not equate to function as we know it, the judge said, so driver was acquitted and we are left to guess the nuances of the law. Plus, the phone in the car. Is it okay as long as you just (fill in the blank) but don’t actually use it?
Another driver who was spotted with his phone mounted in the car by the police, and ticketed, was also acquitted of charges because there was no evidence of him using the device. The murkiness coefficient just increased, though the judge in question agreed that a device in plain view may distract the driver and it is safest is tuck it away. Still, it is not against the law to have it in plain sight. Should the law change?
Cue in devil’s advocate: but what if the two drivers and countless others are just having their phones there, and would never ever throw a peek at the screen or, God forbid, get distracted and itchy to see and maybe even respond if a text notification comes in while they are driving.