Canada and U.S. remain ‘quite far apart’ on softwood lumber, Freeland says

There are “good grounds for reasonable parties” to strike a deal, Freeland said, pointing out the U.S. economy’s dependence on Canadian lumber because it can’t produce enough to satisfy its own needs.

“We remain of the view that a negotiated settlement would be the best outcome for Canadians and Americans — very much including, by the way, middle-class Americans who want to buy a house or at summertime maybe they want to build their deck.”

She said the federal government remains confident in its position that the duties on Canadian producers are punitive and without foundation.

In late April, the U.S. set countervailing levies on Canadian softwood lumber producers ranging from three to 24 per cent on allegations that they are unfairly subsidized, accusations that Ottawa and the Canadian industry rejects.

A decision on anti-dumping duties is set to be announced June 23 that could add another 10 per cent to those tariffs.

On June 1, Ottawa announced a financial aid package worth $867 million for the lumber sector to weather the impact of the duties. But some fear that could embolden arguments from the U.S. lumber lobby that its counterparts in Canada are unfairly subsidized.

Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard vowed to continue fighting for the interests of his province’s forestry industry, no matter how long the trade battle lasts.

“If they think they will tire us out and at some point we will throw in the towel, they’re mistaken,” he said.

Ross Marowits, The Canadian Press

Note to readers: This is a corrected story. A previous version quoted federal Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland as saying Canada and the United States were “very far apart” on negotiating a softwood agreement.

by Canadian Press

Canada and U.S. remain ‘quite far apart’ on softwood lumber, Freeland says

Our Community