File Photo (Image Credit: Contributed / Okke J. Koedooder)
SOUND OFF

SOUND OFF: A Red Bridge replacement represents more than simply a river crossing

Jun 10, 2026 | 2:32 PM

WEYT-K/WEYT-KP (hello/hello to all),

On behalf of Tk̓emlúps te Secwépemc Tkwenem7íple7e7e, I wanted to reach out and share and thank those who participated in the recent Red Bridge information meeting, held at the Moccasin Square Garden (MSG) on June 3, 2026.  The purpose was to provide public information and an opportunity to engage in transportation plans and replacement options of the Red Bridge to the BC Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MOTT).  

In the news, we heard “sound off” in the media regarding the Red Bridge replacement, and I want to take a moment to share some thoughts, knowing others will read this, too.

I hear and respect the concerns being raised about fiscal responsibility and long-term infrastructure priorities. These are important considerations. However, the way this issue has been discussed publicly presents a narrow view of what the Red Bridge truly represents for us here at Tk̓emlúps te Secwépemc (TteS) and our region, our neighbours within the City of Kamloops (CoK).

Through our own lived and daily lives, we know the Red Bridge corridor is not simply a route to an industrial park. It is a critical connection that supports economic activity, supply chains, emergency response, and the continued development within TteS. For us, this project is tied directly to our self-determination, to economic reconciliation, and to our ability to fully participate in regional growth, while fully recognizing this is also an issue of access and equity. The Red Bridge serves our members and non-members who live on our reserve lands, including those who may not have access to a vehicle. It provides reliable connections to employment, services, and community, as well as allows and supports movement between communities in a way that benefits the whole region, not just one group; it is all of us. That kind of access should be recognized as essential.

Framing this project in opposition to a second North Shore crossing oversimplifies reality. I recognize the importance of broader regional discussions on additional crossings, and still, both are needed, and both serve different but equally important purposes. TteS supports the CoK’s position that replacing the Red Bridge is in addition to and not a substitute for the City’s other long-standing transportation infrastructure needs.

Infrastructure planning cannot be based only on today’s pressures or a single viewpoint. It must reflect both present needs and a long-term vision, one that supports partnerships, unlocks land opportunities, and builds resilient connections across the river for future generations.

As we move forward, it is important that the conversation shifts to one of collaboration. Municipal, provincial, and we as TteS, the local First Nation, are always willing to partner as we truly recognize more can be accomplished when we work together to advance multiple priorities, rather than positioning them in competition through public debate.

I will leave you with this: the Red Bridge is not just about moving vehicles. It is about connecting communities, strengthening our economy, and supporting the people who rely on each other every day.

So please, everybody, be heard and support the rebuilding of the Red Bridge.  Show your support by attending the next in-person session at the Sandman Centre (Kia Lounge) on June 11, 2026, from 4:00 pm – 7:00 pm at 300 Lorne Street, or complete the online survey open from June 3–26, 2026, found on https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/transportation-projects/other-transportation-projects/tkemlups-kamloops-network.

——

Editor’s Note: This opinion piece reflects the views of its author, and does not necessarily represent the views of CFJC Today or Pattison Media.