COLLINS: Is it time to put an end to the Reid Hamer-Jackson debacle?
Every time I think it’s time back off on the Reid Hamer-Jackson situation, something new comes up to bring it all back to the forefront.
This week, council listened as Hamer-Jackson was delivering some remarks in reference to last week’s report by municipal adviser Henry Braun, who criticized the mayor severely for not cooperating with his interviews and basically deflecting any of the things he was accused of doing. Hamer-Jackson, at one point, got into some private conversations or some private information and was immediately challenged by city officials that this information was not for public consumption. As the mayor continued to read, Councillor Stephen Karpuk challenged the authority of the chair and was successful in the motion, meaning that the mayor was not chairing the meeting anymore. The meeting then was handed over to the current deputy mayor, Kelly Hall, until the end of the program.
This was a fairly major step by city council and one that never should be taken lightly – and I don’t think councilors took it lightly in this case – but the mayor has this habit of rambling on when he gets in attack mode.
Council has already asked the mayor to resign, but he has refused. It’s time to change that. But we don’t have any opportunities or methods to force someone out unless it’s perhaps criminal or something like that. The government was asked to do something, but there are few ways of getting rid of a mayor – so are we stuck with Reid Hamer-Jackson for the next two years?