ROTHENBURGER: Conflict of interest rulings should be removed from the courts

It’s lengthy and cumbersome. There’s got to be a better way. Conflicts of interest are faced at one time or another by almost every member of a city council or regional district. It happens here frequently, in Kamloops, in nearby communities, and elsewhere in places big and small.

In that same Saturday column, I mentioned the case of Michael Wiebe, a Vancouver councillor and restauranteur who landed in court for voting on patio extensions during COVID. The B.C Supreme Court dismissed the complaint based on the fact a large number of other restauranteurs were also affected.

Turns out the B.C Court of Appeals disagreed and sent the case back to the Supreme Court for reconsideration. The issue was resolved indirectly since Wiebe lost last year’s civic election, a victim of a major turnover on the Vancouver council.

When courts bounce conflict of interest cases back and forth it’s a sure sign the system needs a tune-up, and here’s a way to fix it.

First, empower municipal CAOs or independent legal counsel to rule on conflicts. Provincially, expand the scope of the B.C. conflict of interest commissioner from MLAs to include appeals on municipal and regional conflict matters.

That would avoid a lot of angst, and a lot of conflict.

I’m Mel Rothenburger, the Armchair Mayor.

Mel Rothenburger is a former mayor of Kamloops, alternate TNRD director and a retired newspaper editor. He is a regular contributor to CFJC Today, publishes the ArmchairMayor.ca opinion website, and is a recipient of the Jack Webster Foundation Lifetime Achievement Award. He can be reached at mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.

——

Editor’s Note: This opinion piece reflects the views of its author, and does not necessarily represent the views of CFJC Today or Pattison Media.

by Mel Rothenburger

ROTHENBURGER: Conflict of interest rulings should be removed from the courts

Our Community