By Canadian Press

AG can order remediation agreements in ‘very rare circumstances,’ says Lametti

Dec 11, 2019 | 3:41 PM

OTTAWA — Justice Minister David Lametti says the director of public prosecutions should be the one to decide whether a company should have access to a remediation agreement to avoid being pursued for corporate crimes — most of the time.

The question of who has the final say on whether a company facing criminal trials should be offered a remediation agreement was at the heart of the SNC-Lavalin affair that rocked the Liberal government earlier this year, prompting ex-justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould to resign from cabinet.

The federal ethics watchdog concluded this summer that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau contravened the Conflict of Interest Act when he tried to pressure Wilson-Raybould into intervening, as allowed by law, to head off criminal proceedings on corruption charges against the Montreal-based engineering firm.

Lametti won’t comment specifically on the case of SNC-Lavalin.

But he says a remediation agreement is “a legitimate tool” that belongs “primarily” to the public prosecution service, but there are “very rare circumstances” where an attorney general can step in and take over the process.

1000 Ways to Heal

1000 Ways to Heal: Moons

Dec 10, 2024

Question of the Week

Should Mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson apologize or resign after it was found he breached a section of council's code of conduct for allowing false or misleading information to be communicated?

Dec 09, 2024

One Man's Opinion

COLLINS: Donald has it wrong - again

Dec 08, 2024

He says in those cases, making the decision public is a way to ensure the minister and the government is held to account for the choice.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Dec. 11, 2019.

The Canadian Press