Libs pare rules changes to basics, won’t formalize PMs question period

The government backed away from a number of other ideas earlier this year, including a proposal to use “programming motions” to set in advance the amount of time to be devoted to debate and committee study of each bill, and a time limit on MP speeches during committee hearings.

Opposition parties unanimously panned those recommendations, calling them a bid by the Liberals to control the parliamentary agenda and hamstring their efforts to hold the government to account.

Conservative MP Chris Warkentin said the government is trying to break with decades of political convention by trying to ram through changes to the standing orders, rather than seeking all-party approval.

“This is the way Parliament is governed,” Warkentin said. “It’s quite frankly disappointing to see that this government has taken a tack of, ‘Take it or leave it.’”

He said the Conservatives would look at what the government is proposing and decide whether to support the changes.

“In the past, as was the case in the last Parliament, there was a committee that was set up of all members of the recognized parties and effectively there was a veto power from all the other parties,” he said.

“In this case, the government brought the proposal forward, demanded that the opposition parties support it and threatened to use their majority to pass these provisions if in fact we didn’t.”

Government House leader Bardish Chagger has also dropped plans to test electronic voting, rather than forcing MPs to stand in the Commons for all votes.

The idea of eliminating sparsely attended, half-day Friday sittings of the Commons, reallocating the time to other days or weeks in the parliamentary calendar, has also been deferred.

Chagger said the few changes she wants to see implemented were part of the Liberal election platform.

“All of these changes will strengthen the House of Commons and make the government more accountable,” she told a Commons committee Thursday.

The prime minister’s question period idea is similar to what is standard practice in Britain.

“This special question period would be in addition to the other days of the week when (Trudeau) attends the regular question period to answer questions with his cabinet ministers,” she said.

“Already, our prime minister has shown he is committed to this reform. He has attended six special question periods on Wednesday, answering a total of 233 questions from MPs on those six days alone.”

The Canadian Press

by Canadian Press

Libs pare rules changes to basics, won’t formalize PMs question period

Our Community