Guatemala’s indigenous seek recognition for justice system

For generations, outsiders have looked down on indigenous law courts, as they have on the native cultures themselves. Some 40 per cent of Guatemala’s 17 million people identify themselves as indigenous and they are pushing for wider respect for the traditional ways in which their cultures deal with their differences, though opposition remains strong within the country’s non-indigenous communities.

Guatemala’s constitutional Court already has accepted some rulings by indigenous courts and there’s a move to formally amend the country’s constitution to recognize them. An earlier measure to do that came two votes short in congress, with opposition coming from conservatives and from business interests that said they feared legal confusion if different systems co-exist.

Members of congress were scheduled to discuss the proposed constitutional amendment to recognize indigenous justice as part of the country’s judicial system, but on Wednesday they put off the debate for a week after no consensus emerged among the political parties. At least 105 of 158 legislators must approve the proposal for it to pass.

The idea has gained support from national Attorney General Thelma Aldana, as well as Ivan Velaszuqez, who heads the U.N. Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala that has been assisting in corruption investigations in the country.

“Guatemala has to be a place where all its inhabitants belong,” said Velazquez, who visited Solola to view the court process.

The formal legal system has often exploited or ignored indigenous Guatemalans, who were legally required to perform forced labour well into the 20th century and who generally found it nearly impossible to pay for lawyers. Even now, only 10 per cent of the country’s townships have prosecutors’ offices.

In Solola, Mayor Tomas Saloj presided over hearings in a town hall decorated with the 20 figures representing the Mayan calendar — 20 days per month, 18 months per year. On the table that served as the judge’s bench were a candle and a glass of water, an invitation for the wisdom of dead ancestors to enter.

Punishments can include restitution, community labour, banishment or whippings: Two braided leather whips hang in the Solola town hall as a reminder.

Agustin Bocel, a town spokesman, recalled a case of attempted rape in which the attacker was sentenced to nine lashes of a whip — at the insistence of his own mother, one for each month she carried him, to remind him of the shame he caused her. Bocel said the man has never caused problems again.

Tomas Guarcas, the mayor of nearby Pixabaj, defended the practice.

“Whipping is a punishment that is like educating children, without violating human rights,” he said, adding that the punishment is usually applied by “by one of the offender’s relatives, the mother, father or in-laws.”

Indigenous Congressman Amilcar Pop said the use of floggings is increasingly discouraged, however.

“This type of mechanism is something that has to be controlled and avoided,” Pop said.

Aldana, the attorney general, said she sees no contradiction between the indigenous system and the formal courts. The indigenous courts, she said, “have helped maintain the peace” and helped “reduce pressure on the regular justice system and its budget.”

Victoria Chuj is one of just three women among the 71 mayors in the province of Solola, of which the town of Solola is part. She carries her wooden staff — the badge of her authority, decorated with four tokens representing the four directions — with pride.

“The staff has to be good and straight so that, like justice, it cannot be bent,” Chuj said.

Sonia Perez D., The Associated Press

by Canadian Press

Guatemala’s indigenous seek recognition for justice system

Our Community